Task prioritization in practice: a 7-step process when everything is urgent

“Prioritization is just a waste of time I don’t have anyway.”

If you think that, you’re probably someone who starts the day by checking emails and ends it with the feeling that nothing truly important got done. Many managers I’ve spoken to over the past few years spend most of their time “putting out fires,” reacting to urgent but not necessarily important issues. In practice, this means strategic tasks lose to day-to-day busywork, and high-priority work keeps getting pushed back.

It’s worth emphasizing that effective planning is key to increasing productivity. Planning helps organize time and create schedules, but without proper prioritization even the best plan may fail to deliver the expected results. The difference between planning and prioritization is that planning focuses on organizing tasks over time, while prioritization determines which tasks are actually the most important to do at a given moment.

This problem affects managers, project leaders, senior IT, HR, marketing, and sales specialists - anyone who has more responsibilities than hours in the calendar. The consequences of a lack of effective prioritization and task management are predictable:

• Missed deadlines – projects are delayed because no one knows what should be done first
• Constant overtime – trying to do everything instead of focusing on the tasks with the greatest impact
• Micromanagement within the team – the leader dives into details because employees lack clear priorities

This article is not meant to explain what a priority is in a dictionary sense. I assume you understand the concept and are looking for an answer to the question: how to actually arrange the order of tasks, especially in teamwork and projects. That’s why in the following sections you’ll find:

• A simple framework you can apply starting with tomorrow’s daily
• Concrete methods for setting priorities in a project backlog
• Decision-making algorithms for situations where everything seems equally critical
• A list of common mistakes and ways to avoid them

So, shall we start ;)

‍

Task prioritization vs simple planning – what the difference really is

Imagine two versions of the same workday:

A “planned” day: In the morning, you set up your calendar – meeting at 9:00, report work 10:00–12:00, lunch, email replies 13:00–14:00, project review 14:00–16:00. At 9:30, management calls with an urgent issue. The whole plan falls apart, and you end the day with an unfinished report and a sense of chaos.

A “prioritized” day: In the morning, you define three tasks whose non-completion today would have the biggest consequences over the next 30 days. When management calls, you know whether their issue breaks into your top 3 or can be postponed. You make a conscious decision.

As you can probably see, the difference is this:

• Planning answers the question “when” and spreads tasks over time.
• Task prioritization answers the question “what even makes sense to do and in what order” and segments work by value and risk.

Planning alone fails in three typical situations:

1. When ad hoc tasks come in from management – without clear priorities, every new task becomes “top priority.”
2. When a project is delayed – without impact assessment, individual tasks all seem equally urgent.
3. When a key person drops out of the team – without prioritization, no one knows which tasks must be done and which can wait.

The foundation of effective prioritization is having a “task queue” – an ordered list of real work in progress. Without it, prioritization turns into intuition and the rule of “whoever shouts the loudest.” Proper task prioritization requires using appropriate techniques and tools, such as task lists or time-management applications, which support choosing the most important responsibilities.

In the following sections, you’ll find concrete decision-making algorithms you can use in daily stand-ups, status meetings, and 1:1s. Choosing the right techniques and tools supports effective task prioritization, especially in a dynamic work environment.

‍

‍

Principles and rules of effective prioritization: the foundations of decision-making

Effective task prioritization is not just about choosing what to do first, it’s a key element of achieving goals and real productivity in everyday work. In practice, regardless of industry or team size, a few universal principles prove effective and help make good decisions even when the to-do list seems endless.

The first step is breaking tasks down into smaller subtasks. Splitting large topics into specific, measurable steps makes it easier to assess which elements are truly critical for task execution and goal achievement. This makes it easier to manage time and resources and to identify potential blockers faster.

Another principle is setting priorities based on real impact on team or company goals. Instead of focusing solely on urgency, it’s worth assessing the significance of task prioritization, considering which actions deliver the greatest value in the long term. These tasks should come first on your list.

In daily practice, the Eisenhower matrix works very well here, dividing tasks into four categories: urgent and important, urgent and unimportant, important and not urgent, and neither urgent nor important. This division makes it easy to quickly identify which urgent tasks truly require immediate action and which - despite time pressure - can wait or be delegated. As a result, prioritization becomes more objective and less driven by emotions.

You also can’t ignore the Pareto principle, 20% of tasks generate 80% of results. In practice, this means focusing on the actions that have the greatest impact on goal achievement, while consciously postponing or eliminating less important ones from the plan.

Another proven method is the ABC method, which involves classifying tasks by importance and urgency. Category A tasks must be completed first because failing to do so has the greatest consequences. Category B includes important but not critical tasks, and C includes tasks that can be done if there is time.

The last, but equally important principle, is regular progress monitoring and flexible adjustment of priorities. The world changes, projects evolve, and new information can cause tasks that were at the top of the list yesterday to lose importance today. That’s why effective task prioritization requires systematic review and readiness to change the order of actions.

In summary: the foundation of effective prioritization is not only choosing the right method, but above all consistency in breaking down tasks, setting priorities, assigning them based on importance and urgency, and regularly monitoring progress. These simple rules allow you to achieve better results and maintain control over task execution, even when everything seems “due yesterday.”

‍

‍

A simple prioritization framework for today: what to do first, second, and what to let go

This section gives you a ready-to-use process to start your day, applicable from tomorrow morning. No complex matrices or spreadsheets - a simple framework that works under information overload.

1. Write down all the tasks you need to do that day.
2. Assess which of them are truly important and which can wait.
3. Assign an appropriate priority to each task, this is crucial to manage time effectively and avoid wasting energy on less important matters.
4. Arrange tasks according to assigned priorities, starting with the most important.
5. Execute tasks according to the established order, proper prioritization increases the chances of completing the most important tasks on time.

‍

Starting scenario

You are a project manager. You have 12 tasks across different projects, a dozen emails marked “urgent,” overdue responsibilities from last week, and a meeting with management in the afternoon. Everything seems important.

‍

Step-by-step framework

Step 1: Write all tasks on a single list

Not across three apps and five Slack channels. On one board or in one view. Time required: 5–10 minutes. This is a key element without full visibility, you won’t make good decisions. Writing tasks down is the first step toward building an effective action plan.

‍

Step 2: Eliminate tasks unrelated to current goals

Review your list and cross out everything that is not related to:

• Quarterly OKR goals
• Your team’s KPIs
• The goal of the current sprint

These tasks go into the “maybe someday” category, and will probably never be done. And that’s fine.

‍

Step 3: Mark the 3 tasks with the greatest consequences

Ask yourself: “Which 3 tasks, if not done today, will have the biggest consequences over the next 7–30 days?”

These are not the “easiest” or “quickest to check off” tasks. These are the tasks whose omission generates real costs: lost clients, contractual penalties, project delays.

‍

Step 4: Order the rest by impact

For the remaining tasks, apply a simple impact hierarchy:

1. Impact on the customer
2. Impact on revenue
3. Impact on risk
4. Impact on reputation

One popular classification method is dividing tasks into four categories, which makes prioritization and time management easier.

Step 5: Consciously decide what we will NOT do today

This is the hardest step. Choose 1–2 things you will not do today and communicate this to stakeholders. According to the Pareto principle—20% of effort brings 80% of results. The rest can often wait.

‍

‍

Example: a sales leader at the end of the quarter

Matt, a sales team leader, has on his list:

• Closing 3 deals before the end of the quarter (value: $80,000)
• Preparing sales materials for Q2
• Training for new salespeople
• Responding to an RFP from a potential client
• CRM updates

According to the framework:

• Top 3: closing deals (consequence: quarterly target—task execution is critical to achieving the sales plan), responding to the RFP (consequence: lost opportunity—task execution determines client acquisition), training (consequence: new people lack competencies—task execution affects team effectiveness)
• Postponed: Q2 materials (needed only in 3 weeks)
• Delegated: CRM updates (can be done by an assistant)

Matt communicates to the team and management: “I’ll deliver the Q2 materials in the first week of April. The priority is closing the quarter, which is why executing key tasks has a direct impact on achieving our goals.”

‍

‍

Prioritization in teamwork and projects: how not to get lost in conflicting expectations

A typical organizational conflict: the IT department simultaneously receives “top priority” requests from marketing (campaign landing page), sales (CRM integration), and operations (billing system fix). Each department has its own understanding of task prioritization and believes its issue is the most important.

In projects, it’s less about “whose task is more important” and more about which business outcome takes precedence in a given period. This requires a single “source of truth” for priorities—whether it’s a Kanban board or a roadmap with clearly marked quarterly goals. It’s worth using tools such as Asana, which offer many features supporting project management, such as task lists, schedules, and goal and sub-goal setting, making planning and control easier.

In the following subsections, you’ll find practical approaches to three areas:

• Setting order in the project backlog
• Making decisions during weekly status meetings
• Involving the team without giving up responsibility

‍

How to set task order in a project backlog

When dividing tasks in a backlog, start from the end: first the outcome (quarterly goal, milestone with a date), then detailed tasks. The key here is dividing tasks by importance and urgency—for example, according to the Eisenhower method, which allows effective task classification and time management. This reverses the typical approach of collecting ideas first and then trying to organize them.

Example: IT backlog – online payment integration

The team has 15 tasks in the backlog. After evaluation by criteria:

• P1 (blocks milestone): Payment API integration, security tests, client documentation
• P2 (important, non-blocking): Admin reporting panel, email notifications
• P3 (improvements): Dark mode interface, additional payment methods
  ‍

Only P1 tasks go into the next sprint. The rest wait—and that’s a conscious decision, not neglect.

Practice: Review backlog priorities at least once per sprint (e.g. every 2 weeks). Project conditions change, and priorities must keep up.

‍

Weekly status: how to decide what to accelerate and what to freeze

A weekly status meeting should not be just progress reporting. It’s a moment for priority decisions.

Status meeting structure (30–40 min):

• 10 min: Quick state review – 3–5 key metrics, not all tasks
• 15–20 min: Discussion only of 3–5 critical tasks (delayed, blocking, high risk)
• 10 min: Decisions – what we accelerate, what we postpone, what we cut from scope

Example: launching a new company website

The project has 8 weeks until launch. At status, it turns out:

• Homepage 80% ready
• Product pages 40% ready
• Blog 10% ready
• Animations and “decorations” 5% ready

Decision: freeze blog and animations. Full focus on product pages—because they sell. Blog launches after release.

Leader’s role: You end the status with a summary of priorities for the coming week. Not “meeting notes,” but a concrete list: “This week we do X, Y, Z. A and B are postponed.”

‍

Involving the team in setting priorities (without giving up control)

The team often knows realities better than the manager—it knows which tasks have hidden dependencies and which are technically risky. But the leader takes responsibility for the decision.

A simple technique for involving the team:

Before making a decision, ask the team to rate tasks on a 1–5 scale:

• Technical difficulty
• Risk of error
• Dependencies on other people

Example: marketing campaign for September 2024

Tasks on the board:

• Media buying
• Graphic asset production
• Landing page build
• Tracking/analytics configuration
• Email content preparation

The team assesses dependencies and indicates: “Media buying must go first because it has a 3-week lead time. The landing page depends on assets, so assets must come earlier.”

The leader makes the decision based on this data but is responsible for the outcome.

Practical tip: Use simple visual tools in your team, colors, labels, “top 3” on the board. They help everyone see what truly matters.

‍

‍

When everything is important: practical decision-making algorithms for managers

A typical situation: five “top priority” items from management, three customer crises, overdue tasks from last week. Everything is urgent. Everything is important. At least that’s what stakeholders claim.

In such a situation, you need objective criteria, not intuition. Here are three approaches:

1. Impact × urgency matrix
2. Cost of Delay
3. Bottleneck principle

It’s also worth considering the MoSCoW method as one of the task prioritization techniques. The name comes from the first letters of the English category names: Must have, Should have, Could have, and Won’t have. It clearly defines which tasks are absolutely necessary and which can wait or be omitted in a given project cycle.

The goal is not obedience to “who asks the loudest,” but maximizing business impact with limited team time.

‍

Impact × urgency matrix: quick task ordering for today and this week

This is a practical use of the Eisenhower matrix concept, with an emphasis on business impact rather than general productivity.

Example: a software house with several clients

A project manager’s list:

• Client A: threatens to terminate the contract (value: PLN 20,000/month) – high impact, high urgency
• Client B: asks for a new feature “for yesterday” – low impact, high urgency (deadline negotiable)
• Internal process optimization – high impact, low urgency (schedule)
• Documentation update – low impact, low urgency (drop or delegate)

In 15 minutes, the manager has clarity: today Client A, tomorrow negotiate with B, Friday work on optimization.

‍

Cost of delay: how to calculate what really “can’t wait”

Cost of delay answers the question: what do we lose for each week of delay in completing a given task?

Four categories of cost of delay:

1. Financial: lost revenue, penalties, delayed market entry
2. Operational: longer service times, more manual work
3. Reputational: lower NPS, negative reviews
4. Human: overload of key people, turnover, burnout

Example: automation in customer support

Task: implementing an automated response system.

Current state: 3 people spend 15 hours per week answering automatable queries.

Cost of delay:

• 15 hours × $80/hour = $1,200/week
• Monthly cost of delay: $4,800
• Plus: team frustration, risk of losing an experienced employee

If two tasks have similar impact, take the one with the higher cost of delay first. Even a rough estimate leads to better decisions than having no numbers at all.

‍

Bottleneck: prioritization based on the most constrained resource

In real work, the problem is often not tasks but limited availability of one role - an IT architect, lawyer, designer, senior developer. Available resources determine the pace of the entire project.

Concept in short:

1. Identify the role that delays the most tasks (the bottleneck)
2. Create one clear queue of tasks for that role
3. Prioritize by business impact and cost of delay

Example: ERP system implementation in 2025

The bottleneck is the integration consultant - one person responsible for 12 tasks across 3 projects.

Solution:

• WsAll consultant tasks go on one board
• Daily 10-minute alignment: “Today you do X and Y. Z waits until tomorrow.”
• Other tasks (not requiring the consultant) run in parallel

Optimizing bottleneck work often delivers a greater effect than “speeding up” the rest of the team. Focus on that one point.

‍

‍

Common task prioritization mistakes (and how to avoid them in real projects)

Most managers know the ABC method, MoSCoW, or the Eisenhower matrix. The problem is not knowledge but execution, especially under time and emotional pressure.

‍

The difference between a “presentation priority” and a calendar priority

A real priority is visible in the calendar (blocked time), not in slides with goals.

Example: A strategic project marked in OKRs as “priority A.” But in managers’ calendars—zero blocked time. In practice, the project loses to daily work and won’t be delivered on time.

Simple practice:

• If something is priority A, it must have time blocks in the calendar within the next 7 days
• If it doesn’t—treat it as priority B or lower, regardless of declarations

Once a week (e.g. Monday morning), compare strategic priority lists with the team’s real calendar. Fix mismatches.

A team rule to adopt: “Priority = time + resources,” not just a slogan in a meeting.

‍

‍

How to introduce prioritization at the level of the entire company or department

Situation: every organizational unit has its own “top 5,” but no one looks at the whole picture. Marketing has its priorities, sales theirs, IT theirs. The result? Chaos and mutual blocking.

What’s needed long-term:

1. One source of truth about priorities – a company-wide quarterly priority board visible to everyone
2. Linking priorities to concrete metrics – MRR, churn, order fulfillment time
3. A regular review rhythm – quarterly review plus monthly adjustments

A simple department-level model:

• Maximum of 3 main priorities per quarter
• For each: owner, metric, set of key initiatives
• Clear rules: new initiatives “enter” only when something else “exits”

Example: marketing department in a B2B company in 2024

Three areas compete for team time:

• Lead generation (measurable, short-term)
• Brand building (harder to measure, long-term)
• “Special” projects from management (political)

Department decision: Q2 priority is leads (60% of resources), brand (30%), special projects (10%). Every new special project must push something out of the 10% pool.

Consistency in limiting the number of priorities delivers better results than constantly adding new initiatives.

‍

Tools that help, but don’t replace decisions

Specific types of tools supporting prioritization:

• Kanban boards (inside ICP) – visualization of task queues
• Simple scoring sheets – assessing impact, cost of delay
• Team calendars – blocking time for high-priority tasks

Remember: a tool should support your way of thinking. If there are no clear priority criteria, no app will solve the problem.

Recommendation: start with at most one visual tool (e.g. a shared board) and expand the system later.

Example implementation in 2 weeks:

The project team moves from emails + Excel to a simple board:

• Columns: To do / In progress / Blocked / Done
• Priority labels: P1 / P2 / P3
• Daily 5-minute review: “What is P1 today?”

What distinguishes effective teams is not advanced tool stacks, but discipline in weekly priority organization.

‍

‍

Summary: fewer tasks, more decisions – how to keep priorities moving

Three key takeaways from this article:

1. Prioritization is the art of resignation, not just ordering - setting priorities means deciding what we do NOT do
2. Decisions must be visible - in the calendar, backlog, and team communication, not just in presentations
3. More important than the method are: one “source of truth,” a steady review rhythm, and the courage to consciously let things go

‍

Starting tomorrow morning: define 3 tasks whose non-completion today will have the biggest consequences in the short term. Start your day with them. Not emails. Not “quick wins.” With what truly matters. From the very beginning, you can change how you work—and achieving goals will become real, not just declarative.